Dancing the Political Brand Equity Tango on Social Media Lauren Nelson | September 28th, 2016

This year’s American presidential race has been one of the most contentious in modern history. The level of polarization in the electorate is astounding, and the polls have left her citizens and international spectators alike in a semi-terrified trance of sorts, in disbelief over how close the contest actually is.

And in the middle of the mudslinging and grandstanding are some very, very uncomfortable brands.

It’s important to note that brands are not always neutral in American politics. It’s totally acceptable for an American brand to encourage voters to register or get to the nearest polling station on election day. It’s not uncommon to see brands, like Hotels.com.

 

 

And the way the political donor system works in this country, companies also have the ability to donate to candidates and causes of their choosing, and very frequently do. But for the most part, you don’t see a lot of brands carrying political water. The stewards of those brands often will, but the brand itself won’t be used to denigrate or prop up any given candidate.

But when the first female candidate of a major party is running against a former TV reality star known for his inflammatory rhetoric, all bets are off.

Last week, the Trump campaign found itself in hot water over a graphic it distributed on social media comparing the security threat of an increased refugee population on American soil to a bowl of Skittles with three poisoned candies in the mix.

 

la-na-trailguide-donald-trump-jr-s-tweet-about-refugees-and-skittles-20160920

 

Folks were not pleased, to say the least.

 

 

 

 

But as the campaign doubled down on the analogy, Skittles fired back, putting distance between itself and the candidate’s statements.

 

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, the offending image has since been removed by the Trump team.

Then came Monday’s debate. As Clinton and Trump squared off between their respective podiums, one of Trump’s big talking points related to trade and the loss of jobs as companies moved overseas, saying:

So Ford is leaving. You see that, their small car division leaving. Thousands of jobs leaving Michigan, leaving Ohio. They’re all leaving. And we can’t allow it to happen anymore.

Ford was having none of it, tweeting out:

 

 

Inquiring Twitter minds wanted to know about the plants referenced by Trump, and Ford confirmed that while it is opening a plant in Mexico that will take over production duties currently carried out in a Michigan plant, the Michigan plant will remain operational with zero job losses, just focusing on other products. They’re expanding, not moving away altogether. This was backed up by tweets from the UAW.

The message was clear: Ford wants their brand far, far away from Trump’s politicking. Which says something, given that Ford vehicles take up 4 of the top 10 models driven by Republicans.

But just because some brands are distancing themselves from Trump doesn’t mean they’re endorsing Clinton outright. If anything, they just want away from the fray. The notable exception Monday night was another car company: Honda.

Just ahead of the debate, the company’s official Twitter account tweeted out a seeming endorsement.

 

 

It didn’t take long for the tweet to get taken down, with most speculating that — as was the case with the now infamous KitchenAid Obama tweet — it was a case where a social media manager accidentally tweeted out something meant for their personal account. Honda confirmed as much yesterday.

 

 

In other words, brands aren’t really breaking with tradition altogether. If anything, it seems as though they’re working hard to maintain that tradition due to the unique dynamic in today’s race. Trump has been known to repeat things that have been proven factually incorrect despite debunking, so it’s possible that brands are being more direct to ensure they don’t get caught up in the resulting confusion. That’s not necessarily anti-Trump so much as anti-drama, and that’s about as traditional as it gets.

But hey — there’s still 40 days until election day, and given the way this cycle has played out so far, that’s plenty of time for things to change.

From many minds, the perfect design. Post your project today and let the crowd wow you!

Join the crowd that's raving about the crowdSPRING Blog

Get our weekly digest of can't-miss content on how to take your brand to the next level.

Creative needs?

We have 200,000 creative professionals ready to help you with custom logo design, web design, or a new company name. Take your project to the crowd!

Click to get started on

Free eBooks

interviews with graphic and web designers

12 Question Interviews with cS designers.
Get it »

contracts for graphic designers

Contracts for designers who hate contracts.
Get it »

contracts for software and website developers

Contracts for software developers who hate contracts. Get it »

Latest tweets

crowdSPRING @crowdspring
Small business and startup tips: training day! https://t.co/WooRWu8NfO
crowdSPRING @crowdspring
Choosing Technologies for Your Web Startup (Part 2) https://t.co/snc4ElJMgr

About crowdSPRING

Tens of thousands of the world's best and most successful entrepreneurs, businesses, agencies and nonprofits rely on crowdSPRING for affordable and risk-free custom logo design, web design, a new company name or other writing and design services. More than 200,000 designers and writers work on crowdSPRING. We create designs and names people love. 100% guaranteed.

Learn more »
Read previous post:
Why Your Company Should Be Doing #3FictionalCharacters

You know the feeling. You're scrolling down your Twitter feed or your Facebook timeline, and you see a new hashtag....

Close