I Was Paid To Say That But I Would Have Said It Anyway Ross | December 16th, 2008

“Every man alone is sincere. At the entrance of a second person, hypocrisy begins.” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

This isn’t another post about Chris Brogan’s Dadomatic blog. That subject has been capably covered by others, including Scott Henderson, Jeremiah Owyang, Ben Kunz, and Chris Brogan.

What this post is about:

Robert Scoble asserted yesterday that it’s improper to mix editorial and advertising and to accept fees from sponsors to create editorial content. As you will see below, Scoble’s claim reeks of hypocrisy.

[NOTE: I emailed Scoble after our conversation, said that I was writing an article, and invited him to comment. He responded and agreed that I could publish his response - it is at the end of this post]

My discussion with @Scobleizer started with his tweet:

I asked Scoble whether he was serious (I don’t presume to know) and also about the difference between ads on his own site and Brogan’s post:

I have my opinion about the subject, but here was a great opportunity to engage Scoble one-on-one and discuss a hot and important topic.

This is where things took an unexpected turn. In responding to my question, Scoble made what seemed like a clear – huge! – distinction between ads and editorials:

Without debating whether or not Brogan’s post was an editorial, it’s clear that most can tell the difference between an “editorial” and an ad. Right? They look different, they sound different, they are presented differently:

I don’t like hypocrisy.

But Scoble’s statement wasn’t hypocritical for the reasons you think. I don’t fault him for taking ads from Seagate. Seagate has been a true friend to Scoble and has supported him for years. They’re a good company – I’ve bought many of their products.

Scoble’s statement was hypocritical because Scoble has engaged in the very same behavior he was now condeming.  And not only engaged – but in a virtually identical manner. Compare:

Titles:

First Sentence Disclaimers:

Content:

Scoble’s review of Seagate’s new wireless portable device vs. Brogan’s review of Kmart.

You can reach your own conclusions. And in case you wonder whether that was Scoble’s only “editorial”, it wasn’t. You can find plenty more, including here, here, and here.

This post isn’t about whether sponsored blog posts are appropriate. It’s about hypocrisy.

If you get on a high horse, claim to speak authoritatively, and point fingers, it generally helps if you are not pointing them at yourself.

12/16/2008 3:34 pm CST Update

Scoble’s Response:

First of all, I wasn’t “attacking” Chris Brogan at all. If you thought I was, you aren’t reading my posts very clearly. He did nothing wrong, other than to sell his name out too cheaply.

The differences are clear:

#1 Seagate doesn’t pay me to “post.” They don’t ask me to take editorial positions. As a sponsor they get their name on the beginning of the show. You should see Allen Stern’s writeup on the whole thing, I wonder how many of these bloggers would go into a Kmart or a Sears on their own and write effusively about the experience.

#2 Seagate pays me enough to make a living wage. There’s no way anyone is going to make a living wage at $500 a post. Yes, it’s nice to buy a toy at Christmas time, but how are you going to make a good salary and buy medical coverage and all that doing that? I’d rather bloggers see the huge value they have in front of them rather than trying to sell posts like that.

[Note from Ross: I'll refrain from commenting to this response - I believe that my original post speaks for itself]

Need something designed? Name your price. Pick from 110+ entries. Love it or your money back.

Like our blog? You’ll freaking love our Twitter updates. Oh, and you’ll dig our Facebook page too.

  • Pingback: ezineaerticles » Blog Archive » I Was Paid To Say That But I Would Have Said It Anyway …

  • Pingback: Understanding Izea’s Sponsored Blogging Service

  • fredK

    Couldn’t agree more, Ross. I missed the whole Chris Brogan rumpus which seemed very much envy driven, but Scoble’s doings just seem… oh, wtf. He decides how he wants to be perceived. ;)

    This whole debate seems somehow, albeit tangentially (is that a word even?), to be related to the many whinings from People who did the Mac OS X 10.5.6 update *without bothering to read the update info*. Apple clearly disclosed that if you had 3rd party //system-affecting// apps or had modified the system in unsupported ways, running the update might cause problems. Which, judging by some comments on Apple forums and fan sites, and Twitter bless its little fluttering heart, it did. Similar to how the first iPhone OS update wrecked many ‘jailbroken’ iPhones…

    I’ve run the updater on my 3 Macs (Intel iMac, G4 Powerbook, Original Mini) on systems ranging between 10.4 to 10.5 and had nary a glitch. The iMac hiccupped a little at the end, but it’s not quite right anyway, so… It was a big update. You have to consider that.

    Anyway, this post has nothing to do with the Mac OS update really. Sorry for venting. I need coffee… ;)

Hey, it's crowdSPRING!

Tens of thousands of the world's best and most successful entrepreneurs, businesses, agencies and nonprofits use crowdSPRING for affordable and risk-free custom logo design, web design, a new company name or other writing and design services. More than 158,000 designers and writers work on crowdSPRING. We create designs and names people love. 100% guaranteed.

Get Blog Updates

Free E-Books

12 Question Interviews with cS designers.
Get it »

Contracts for designers who hate contracts.
Get it »

Contracts for software developers who hate contracts. Get it »

More in Marketing and branding, Social media (252 of 291 articles)

/** chartbeat **/