Archive for December, 2008

Happiness Is Helping

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

Can you make a difference if you help just one person per day? You bet!

Many of us become involved with efforts to help the environment, cancer research, and numerous other large-scale causes. Those efforts are worthy and important.

Some of us help by donating money. Others help by volunteering their time. At the end of the day, most of us feel happy that we were able to help, in a small way, a worthy cause.

When it comes to small-scale efforts, most of us are less interested. After all, if I can spend 2 hours helping thousands of people, why should I spend 2 hours helping just one person? It’s a fair question and the answer will differ for most people.

As we get ready to start a brand new year, think about how you can help others. Imagine how much good you can do if you help just one person per day. Imagine how much good THEY would do if they too help one person per day.

We should all continue to wake up in the morning with a strong desire to help as many people as we can. We should continue to help protect the environment, promote cancer research, and other large-scale worthy efforts. We should strive to share our knowledge and educate as many people as we can.

But we should also remember when we wake up in the morning that we can help just one person per day. It seems small – just one person – but the effect can be powerful and real.

What can you do to help someone today?

Keep Things In Perspective

Monday, December 29th, 2008

It is not unusual to get bent out of shape, become angry, and to express our frustrations when things don’t go as planned. We do this when a potential client doesn’t select us for an assignment, when someone says something negative about us, our companies or people we care about, and in many more situations.

When we are presented with frustrating news and situations, we often forget to keep things in perspective. An incident this past weekend reminded me about the importance of perspective.

Due to very heavy snow fall and rain in Chicago, many areas experienced flooding. The neighbors immediately next to our house were out of town – we called them to let them know about the flooding and to see if they had someone check their house. They already knew about the flooding. It turns out that they were visiting the Holocaust Museum in Washington D.C. and just as they had completed their visit, they received a call from their home alarm company reporting about the flooding and letting them know that their basement had more than a foot of standing water.

Our neighbor’s basement was ruined completely, but it paled in comparison to what they saw during their visit to the Holocaust Museum. The news about the flooding certainly wasn’t good, but when put in perspective, it wasn’t much.

I am not suggesting that you ignore frustrating news and situations. But when you presented with such news and situations, keep things in perspective.

Ten Practical Search Engine Marketing (SEM) Tips

Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008

Mike and I stated working on crowdSPRING in the summer of 2006. We incorporated the company in May 2007 and launched the crowdSPRING marketplace in May 2008. We’ve learned many important lessons along the way. In some ways, our experience is typical of other start-ups. In other ways, it is not. I want to share some of our adventures (and mis-adventures) in the hope that it’ll help others looking to start a company or those who’ve already launched a start-up. So, from time to time, I’ll post a new tip, based on our experience with crowdSPRING over the past two years (and my experience advising technology start-ups over my 13 year career as an attorney). Follow me on Twitter for more tips.

Start-up Tip 6: Ten Practical Search Engine Marketing (SEM) Tips

Given the huge amounts of money spent on SEM, it’s a sure bet that you are going to consider whether you should spend some of your valuable dollars on SEM as part of your overall marketing strategy.

[NOTE: The suggestions in this post apply to both start-ups and to established companies looking to launch SEM campaigns].

SEM involves using search engines (such as Google) to promote your product or service. Billions of searches are performed every single month. When you start an SEM campaign, you decide how much you are willing to spend and the keywords that you want to bid on. You set your maximum budget (per day/per month) and if you happen to be among the highest bidders for a given keyword when search results are being delivered, your ad will be shown alongside search results (on the side or at the top, for example). SEM ads are circled in red in the following search on Google for “graphic design”.

SEM is a simple idea and can be a powerful tool for many companies. It can also be costly and ineffective for other companies.

While much has been written about SEM by many self-professed “experts”, it’s not easy to find useful tips for SEM campaign(s). And there’s also this – a huge amount of SEM content is not only bullshit – it’s wrong.

I am not suggesting that you should become an expert in SEM or manage your own SEM campaigns. SEM can be complicated and it does require a great deal of attention. We’ve been using and recommend Keyword First if you want some expert help in this area.

On the other hand, plenty of people self-manage successful SEM campaigns. Don’t be intimidated by all of the options and tools. If you decide to conquer SEM on your own, I want to share with you what we’ve learned about SEM over the past seven months.

I am not an expert in this area. These are the things I would have wanted to know back in May 2008 when we launched crowdSPRING – and I hope that they help you to avoid some of the SEM mistakes we made along the way.

So, here we go – the 10 things I would have loved to know about SEM the day we launched crowdSPRING:

1. Define your goal

I do understand that for most, the goal is to make money. But that typically doesn’t happen overnight. Before you can evaluate whether SEM campaign(s) can play an important role in your overall marketing efforts, you’ll need to set interim goals for those campaigns so that you can measure your progress. For example, one interim goal could be to drive a certain amount of traffic to your site (regardless of conversion rates). Another interim goal could be to get your cost per conversion rates below a certain amount after 90 days. You can also set a more specific goal – for example, driving more traffic when people search for logo design, web design, or company name on the various search engines.

We never established interim goals early on, which led to much confusion. Once we started setting interim goals, it was easier for us to assess progress.

2. Define conversion accurately

A conversion is an action that a user performs on your website. For example, if you care most about registrations of new users, a user who registers on your site from an SEM lead will count as a conversion. Conversion is important because you will ultimately look at the cost to obtain each new conversion on your site. If the cost is under your budget, you’ll be happy. If the cost is greater than your budget, you might find that SEM might not be an effective option for your business.

Early on, we kept changing our definition of “conversion” and this created two problems. First, it created useless data because we could not compare conversion rates later in the campaigns to the earlier data. Second, it made conversion a moving target and made it difficult to evaluate our success. Once we settled on a defined conversion, it was much easier to make decisions and look at comparative metrics.

3. Develop your keywords smartly and carefully

You’ll want to spend some time researching your keywords. This can take time. Look at your competitors and find the keywords they are using to market their products or services. Look at the meta keywords in their HTML code – these will give you lots of insight into the keywords your competitors consider important. Use tools to create permutations of words, to find singulars, plurals, synonyms, etc. of your intended keywords.

I use (and like) the SEO for Firefox extension to help with keyword strategy. You might take a look at the various businesses, such as Keyword Discovery, that help you focus on the keywords that might be most important for your SEM campaigns.

You’ll also want to spend some time with this powerful tool from Google that allows you to view statistics based on actual Google search queries. This tool will look at your existing site and prepare a keyword report based on the content on your site – a very helpful feature.

Keep an open mind about keywords. If you are bidding on a term such as “mortgage”, you’ll find that plenty of others may out-bid you. So you need to get creative. Are there other ways to refer to the same terms that are not quite as popular, but perhaps more affordable for you? For example, if you’re optimizing on the term company name, consider business name instead. Don’t get overly fixated on any single word. SEM campaigns can include huge lists of keywords. Our own SEM campaign has included thousands of keywords. A company like Ebay is easily tracking millions of keywords in their SEM campaigns.

You’ll be presented with many different options when setting-up your SEM campaigns – take the time to study and learn the differences between those options. For example, you’ll have to decide on Google whether you want a Broad Match, Phrase Match, Exact Match or Negative Keyword. Don’t be afraid to experiment. Broad matches would cause your ads to appear more often (thus potentially maxing out your SEM spend earlier in the month). Exact match would cause your ads to appear less often, potentially stretching your budget, but you might find your conversion rates are lowe. Every company is different and there is no clear rule for which type of matching option will work for you.

4. Ad Copy is important

You have very limited space for your SEM ad copy. And since your ad is shown next to other contextual advertisements for the same keywords, ad copy matters. Remember that unless you entice a user to click on your ad, it won’t matter if you have a great landing page, great product, or great service.

A few suggestions: look at your competitors and study how they market via SEM to their potential customers. Are they focusing on price? Value? Guarantees? Selection? You’ll want to find ways to distinguish your ad from others and you’ll have a tough time doing so unless you know what your competitors are doing.

You certainly can study larger companies, but remember that their SEM spending is substantial and no single ad will give you great insight into their strategy. You are better off focusing on smaller, more budget conscious competitors.

(more…)

The Culture of Customer Service

Friday, December 19th, 2008

Ross recently wrote a post about talking with people, not to them.

When it comes to customer service, many people forget this lesson. It’s simple. Customer service is first being human.

Great customer service means listening, talking with customers, fixing what doesn’t work, and saying “I’m sorry” when you did something wrong.

We look up to companies like Zappos who don’t merely talk about great customer service – they built enormously successful businesses on delivering great customer service.

It’s important to find ways to help customers before they ask for help or complain. And of course it’s important to provide great service when customers ask you for help or complain about their experience.

At crowdSPRING, customer service starts from the moment a user visits our homepage. We spend a lot of time thinking about how we communicate with visitors. We put links to customer service on every single page on our site. And we spend a great deal of time talking with our community about ways we could help them and other guests better.

We listen,  think, meet, think more, meet a bit more, talk and listen again. We then respond to the needs of our customers.

We’ve discovered that our own community can help us to provide great customer service. For example, our creatives have collaborated on a number of excellent guides for buyers and other creatives, including a guide about logo design tips for buyers, a guide for buyers to effectively manage their design projects, and a guide about succeeding as a creative on crowdSPRING. Recently, a creative – Ella – shared her excellent proof sheets for logos and for stationery with her peers – the people she often competes against – so that THEY could provide a better service to clients.

Great customer service demands a culture that values the customer. Customer service is not a quick or cheap fix. It’s not something you do for a few minutes each day. It’s not what you do only when a customer complains for the third time.

It’s not easy to create a great customer service culture. It takes effort, it takes passion, and it takes a real appreciation that customer service can create great companies.

The effort is worth it. We love our community. We love our customers.

Jerome – The French Guy

A Simple Thank You Can Be Very Powerful

Thursday, December 18th, 2008

Technology has transformed the way we communicate. Email, SMS, Twitter, Facebook, Flickr, MySpace, and other forms of  communications have allowed people who would not have “met” ten years ago to develop social relationships.

We get many great emails from people every day thanking us for what we do. Those emails put huge smiles on the faces of our entire team. We feel good when we learn that in some small way, we’ve helped another person.

Yesterday, we received a postcard and a handwritten note from a creative who works on crowdSPRING – Audree Rowe. It’s a wonderful note and a great postcard. We posted it on our refrigerator door.

Our team was really moved that Audree took a few minutes to send us her kind note. It’s pretty amazing that a little handwritten note can be so powerful.

We are very fortunate at crowdSPRING. We love our community.

[I asked Audree if we can share her note here and she graciously agreed.]

I Was Paid To Say That But I Would Have Said It Anyway

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008

“Every man alone is sincere. At the entrance of a second person, hypocrisy begins.” (Ralph Waldo Emerson)

This isn’t another post about Chris Brogan’s Dadomatic blog. That subject has been capably covered by others, including Scott Henderson, Jeremiah Owyang, Ben Kunz, and Chris Brogan.

What this post is about:

Robert Scoble asserted yesterday that it’s improper to mix editorial and advertising and to accept fees from sponsors to create editorial content. As you will see below, Scoble’s claim reeks of hypocrisy.

[NOTE: I emailed Scoble after our conversation, said that I was writing an article, and invited him to comment. He responded and agreed that I could publish his response - it is at the end of this post]

My discussion with @Scobleizer started with his tweet:

I asked Scoble whether he was serious (I don’t presume to know) and also about the difference between ads on his own site and Brogan’s post:

I have my opinion about the subject, but here was a great opportunity to engage Scoble one-on-one and discuss a hot and important topic.

This is where things took an unexpected turn. In responding to my question, Scoble made what seemed like a clear – huge! – distinction between ads and editorials:

Without debating whether or not Brogan’s post was an editorial, it’s clear that most can tell the difference between an “editorial” and an ad. Right? They look different, they sound different, they are presented differently:

I don’t like hypocrisy.

But Scoble’s statement wasn’t hypocritical for the reasons you think. I don’t fault him for taking ads from Seagate. Seagate has been a true friend to Scoble and has supported him for years. They’re a good company – I’ve bought many of their products.

Scoble’s statement was hypocritical because Scoble has engaged in the very same behavior he was now condeming.  And not only engaged – but in a virtually identical manner. Compare:

Titles:

First Sentence Disclaimers:

Content:

Scoble’s review of Seagate’s new wireless portable device vs. Brogan’s review of Kmart.

You can reach your own conclusions. And in case you wonder whether that was Scoble’s only “editorial”, it wasn’t. You can find plenty more, including here, here, and here.

This post isn’t about whether sponsored blog posts are appropriate. It’s about hypocrisy.

If you get on a high horse, claim to speak authoritatively, and point fingers, it generally helps if you are not pointing them at yourself.

12/16/2008 3:34 pm CST Update

Scoble’s Response:

First of all, I wasn’t “attacking” Chris Brogan at all. If you thought I was, you aren’t reading my posts very clearly. He did nothing wrong, other than to sell his name out too cheaply.

The differences are clear:

#1 Seagate doesn’t pay me to “post.” They don’t ask me to take editorial positions. As a sponsor they get their name on the beginning of the show. You should see Allen Stern’s writeup on the whole thing, I wonder how many of these bloggers would go into a Kmart or a Sears on their own and write effusively about the experience.

#2 Seagate pays me enough to make a living wage. There’s no way anyone is going to make a living wage at $500 a post. Yes, it’s nice to buy a toy at Christmas time, but how are you going to make a good salary and buy medical coverage and all that doing that? I’d rather bloggers see the huge value they have in front of them rather than trying to sell posts like that.

[Note from Ross: I'll refrain from commenting to this response - I believe that my original post speaks for itself]

Most In Social Media Act Like Two Year Olds

Monday, December 15th, 2008

“There are no seven wonders of the world in the eyes of a child.  There are seven million.” (Walt Streightif)

Most people involved in social media are like two year old kids.

Two year old kids enjoy playing alongside other kids, but keep to themselves. After they  turn three, kids begin to have real friendships with others kids.

The blogosphere, Twitter, and other social media platforms are crammed with two year old kids. Thousands of people are writing articles about the same narrow subjects. A day doesn’t go by without dozens of people soliciting advertising for their blogs and dozens of others touting about being advertising-free. Most are trying to figure out ways to leverage social media and to be “followed”, rather than focusing on what they are saying.

How many “friend me on Facebook”, “connect with me on LinkedIn”, “follow me on Twitter” conversations have you seen lately? A ton. How many people have written articles about the “definitive way to leverage Twitter.” A ton.

There’s nothing wrong with a narrow focus or the desire to get paid for what you do – lots of people depend on social media to put food on their family’s table.

But just like two year old kids – few people in social media engage in real play with each other, much less their broader audience. Blog after blog is filled with posts but no comments. Forget real conversations – there often is not even real interaction.

Let’s be real – two 140 character tweets on Twitter do not amount to a real conversation. One comment left on another blog does not amount to a real conversation.

It’s a shame.

We’ve been conditioned to believe that technological tools need time to mature. We’re all waiting for everyone to get a grasp of social media before we begin to use those tools in earnest. We want others to experiment and make mistakes and don’t hesitate to point fingers when someone does something different. And we don’t want to share -we object that others are allowed to play in our sandbox.

But not everyone acts like a two year old in social media. Some get it. Some understand that that unlike two year old kids who need another year to mature to the point where they’ll appreciate playing with others, we have this capacity right now. Sometimes, it means moving to another sandbox to play. Sometimes, it means engaging strangers in real conversations.

We certainly can wait for social media to grow up. But we must grow up with it. And unlike two year old kids – we don’t need to wait another year.

Can He Really Do Handstands?

Friday, December 12th, 2008

Oh jeez guys. I’m really nervous. In fact, I really didn’t even know what to say.

But, I’m seriously happy and pumped to say that I work here now. Crazy, right?!

Let me introduce myself: I’m Judson Collier, and I’m a 17 year old (yes, 17. I actually said in my application that I was 16. Whoops!) from Jacksonville Florida. I’m happily in love with graphic design, blogging, photography and filmmaking. I listen to awesome music, such as epic The Shins, Joshua Radin, Coldplay and Ingrid Michaelson.

You might have seen my application video that Angeline posted last week.


Stop-Motion App-uh-lu-cat-ion from Judson on Vimeo

You might have heard the ruckus about the coolest kid in town Angeline Vuong leaving. I certainly can’t fill her shoes (much less fit in them). crowdSPRING will be hiring a community manager to replace Angeline. I’ve been talking with Pete, Mike and Ross, and we’ve figured out a couple of things I can do to help.

That said, the guys thought it would be cool to put together a top five reasons why I wanted to work at crowdSPRING, and top five reasons why I was hired! Czech it out!

Top 5 Reasons I Wanted To Work at crowdSPRING (other than I was broke):

1. Ping. Pong. Masters.
1a. Rock. Band. Legends.
2. Excellent Taste in absolutely ridiculous copywriting.
3. I can work in my pajamas and no one will find out.
4. They are serious Twitter addicts like me!
5. crowdSPRING brings the world more good design! Why WOULDN’T I want to be here?

Top 5 Reasons crowdSPRING Hired a High School Kid:

1. We share the same maturity level (I kid, I kid! Don’t hurt me :) )
2. I play a mean drumset in Rock Band.
3. I make some crazy videos.
4. I can whistle and hum at the same time. No lies. I sound like a blender.
5. I first heard about crowdSPRING from Angeline herself, and signed up as a creative!

Okay, but in all seriousness, I’m extremely happy to be here, as creating and designing is a huge passion of mine. I’ve been designing websites and making graphics for about 5 years now, and I love it! I’ll be blogging here often, and if you see a couple crazy ideas coming out of the woodwork, it’s probably my doing. You can also follow me on Twitter!

Think They'll Give Me A Pulitzer Prize For Journalism?

Thursday, December 11th, 2008

Why not?

Two-thirds of Americans are dissatisfied with traditional journalism. Nearly half rely on the Internet as their primary source for news. Still, most people are not prepared to throw away traditional journalism.  The vast majority – 87% of people – think that professional journalism will continue to play an important role.

Some traditional journalism organizations embraced the rapid changes while others have held back and are now paying the price for their indecisiveness. Those who’ve embraced the Internet have a huge head start on their competitors. The Chicago Tribune and it’s ColonelTribune, and more recently, the Chicago SunTimes, have been on the bleeding edge in embracing social networks. Crain’s Chicago Business offers interesting and unique content not available in its print edition, such as its video interviews. The New York Times had nearly 800 million (!) page views in October 2008 – over three times more than its nearest competitor.

You might recall that some years ago, traditional media organizations largely dismissed online “amateurs” as a fad and categorically rejected the notion that non-professionals could ever compete with professionals.

So how can we measure whether those non-professionals have had a meaningful impact? Here’s one way: the Pulitzer Prizes for journalism. These prizes – 14 in all – are given to the “best” American newspaper reporters and commentators. Prior to the 2009 prizes (which are for work completed in 2008), only print publications were eligible.  For 2009, the Pulitzer Prizes are open from submissions from web-only news outlets.

Starting with the 2009 awards, the Pulitzers are truly about the words and serious reporting because it no longer matters whether those words were written by a professional and published in the New York Times, or written by an amateur and published in a blog dedicated to original news reporting and coverage of ongoing stories.

As the NYT reported in a comment from Dan Gillmore, the Director of the Center for Citizen Media:

“the decision would open the prizes to journalists ‘excluded in the past due to the anachronistic system that had ruled.’”

The decision by the Pulitzer Board underscores the Board’s respect and dedication to the true value of words and serious reporting. It also shows that the Pulitzers are serious about leveling the playing field. (Seth Godin had a different take today on this issue in his post – You ‘re Not Going To Win The Pulitzer)

It is a great step forward – for journalism – and a strong message to other industries who have not yet embraced similar change.

What Does Tribal Leadership Teach Us About Building Strong Communities and Organizations?

Wednesday, December 10th, 2008

Tribal Leadership: Leveraging Natural Groups to Build a Thriving Organization (by Dave Logan, John King, and Halee Fischer-Wright).

Most people believe that innovation, quality and success is the product of great leadership. A ten year, 24,000 person study found that “tribes”, naturally forming groups of between 20-150 people, and not leaders, drive success in virtually all organizations.

I agree. I read Tribal Leadership earlier this year on a recommendation from Tony Hsieh. I believe that every leader – and everyone who wants to be a great leader – should read this book. Here’s what I wrote to the authors of the book:

“Immediately after I finished reading Tribal Leadership, I ordered multiple additional copies so that others at crowdSPRING could read it too. No non-fiction book has ever had such a profound impact on me.”

Great leaders understand their own limitations and know that it’s not easy to change cultures, especially in larger organizations. Gimmicks, “initiatives”, and massive cultural changes are often artificial and fall flat. Great leaders know that the only way to move the culture of an organization is to focus on groups – tribes – within those organizations.

While Tribal Leadership is about organizations, it’s lessons apply to social communities, including forums, Twitter, Facebook, and other social communities. I’ve personally applied those lessons to how I interact in social communities, including our own on crowdSPRING. I encourage everyone who is serious about social media to read this book.

The book describes the five stages of tribal culture. The stages are:

Stage 1 – “Life Sucks”. People in stage one believe that life sucks. Period. They believe that there is nothing the individual can do to fix problems. This type of culture is found in prisons and among gangs, but amazingly, also in two percent of corporate tribes.

Stage 2 – “My Life Sucks”. People in stage two know that life can be good, but believe that their life sucks. This stage represents 25 percent of all corporate culture. People in stage 2 blame others and rarely do anything voluntarily to help. If you’ve seen the television show The Office, you’ll see a good example of a stage 2 tribe. You’ll also know people around you who are stuck in this stage.

Stage 3 – “I’m Great”. Stage 3 is the dominant culture in companies in the United States. People in Stage 3 think “I’m great” but there’s a hidden statement that’s often left unsaid – “I’m great and you aren’t.” People in stage 3 are driven to win, but winning is personal. They view others, including teammates and those outside their organization, as their competitors. If you look around your organizations – and even at yourself – it’s highly likely that on most days –you and others are at stage 3. While stage 3 cultures can achieve great successes – stage 3 also leads to burnout. Microsoft has been operating in a stage 3 culture for a lengthy period of time.

Stage 4 – “We’re great”. This stage represents 22 percent of tribal cultures. This stage compares “our tribe ”against other tribes. Tribes at stage 4 collaborate and put the good of the tribe above the good of the individual.The tribes within Apple are at stage 4 much of the time. Tribes at stage 4 share information and build on each other’s success.

Stage 5 – “Life is great.” Only two percent of tribes fall in this stage. Tribes at this stage want to make history and have produced real innovations. The team that produced the first Macintosh was stage 5. Tribes operating at stage 5 are true leaders and true innovators.

Tribal Leadership offers real and meaningful insight into how leaders can help to move their tribes and individual members of their tribes, to the next stage. This insight is extremely valuable. Let me tell you why.

(more…)