Archive for August, 2008

Start-up Tip: Lead By Example, Not By Title

Friday, August 29th, 2008

Mike and I stated working on crowdSPRING in the summer of 2006. We incorporated the company in May 2007 and launched the crowdSPRING marketplace in May 2008. We’ve learned many important lessons along the way. In some ways, our experience is typical of other start-ups. In other ways, it is not. I want to share some of our adventures (and mis-adventures) in the hope that it’ll help others looking to start a company or those who’ve already launched a start-up. So, once or twice every week for the next few months, I’ll post a new tip, based on our experience with crowdSPRING  over the past two years (and my experience advising technology start-ups over my 13 year career as an attorney).

Start-up Tip 2: Lead By Example, Not By Title

Several days ago, I had a long talk with a good friend about leadership. She felt that she was not doing a good job leading the people working for her. She wondered whether she was really cut out to be a leader. She wondered whether she could truly lead if it meant having to coerce others into doing things, to manipulate her employees into working hard, and forcing people to listen to her.

Coerce? Manipulate? Force? For a minute, I thought my friend had taken lessons from a character is a Scott Adams comic strip.

Too many people are obsessed with titles, labels, and org charts. I’ve worked for such people. I’ve known and represented (as an attorney) such people – including many C-level executives at large corporations.

When Mike and I founded crowdSPRING, we committed to lead by example, not by title. We committed to apply the very best qualities we had seen in great leaders and to work hard in avoiding the very worst. We make plenty of mistakes and we’ll continue to do so. But we try our very best to show our team that true leadership is not about coercion, manipulation or force.

I recently read an outstanding book about organizational behavior and leadership – Tribal Leadership. The authors, management consultants from CultureSync, a management consulting firm specializing in cultural change, strategy and negotiation, studied 24,000 people at several dozen companies over a ten year period. They found that every organization is a tribe of 20 to 150 people, or a network of tribes, if the organization is large enough. They found that tribes are more powerful than teams, companies, or even CEOs. And they found a common theme: “the success of a company depends on its tribes, the strength of its tribes is determined by the tribal culture, and a thriving corporate culture can be established by an effective tribal leader.”

Immediately after I finished reading Tribal Leadership, I ordered multiple additional copies so that others at crowdSPRING could read it too. No non-fiction book has ever had such a profound impact on me.

Let me repeat: true leadership is not about coercion, manipulation or force. For far too long, people have followed management practices and principles defined decades ago. If you’ve seen the movie Office Space, you’ll know exactly what I’m talking about.

Good leaders inspire people to work hard. Great leaders inspire people to do their absolute best. And in a start-up with very limited funds and small teams, it’s critical that people do their absolute best. Anything less is often economic suicide.

These are the thoughts I shared with my friend and some of the principles (there are many more) that guide us at crowdSPRING:

  • Lead by example at all times. You’re not a true leader merely because of your title
  • Never stop learning – do whatever it takes to become a better leader
  • Use the right words. What you say as a leader always matters
  • Appreciate differences. Use people’s differences as a source of strength for the entire team
  • Motivate yourself. You cannot motivate others unless you motivate yourself
  • Collaborate with your team to innovate instead of pushing ideas on them
  • Empower people around you to succeed – give them responsibility and authority
  • Treat others with compassion and respect. Don’t just tell them they are important. Show them.
  • Promote a collaborative culture where everyone is a leader

Let me offer a few practical examples too – from our own experience at crowdSPRING. Many months ago, during a team meeting, I was frustrated, and took out my frustration on the person leading the meeting. My reaction was stupid. It was anything but leadership by example, much less good leadership. I ignored every principle I listed above. I talked to that person and apologized. And promised to myself not to do that again. Ever. What you say as a leader always matters.

So how do you avoid confrontations and especially situations when someone on the team is being confrontational or stubborn? Here’s what we’ve done. First – we try very hard to channel the confrontational and stubborn attitude of that person in a team discussion into a productive, constructive discussion about their own ideas or resistance to the ideas offered by others. Second – we talk privately to that person after the team discussion to tell them that we love their passion, their ideas and participation, and greatly value their input. And we also explain that how THEY react during a team discussion reflects on everyone. What THEY say always matters. What they do either fosters or detracts from a collaborative culture. We ask them to look at themselves as a leader and to appreciate the impact they could have on the entire team – both negative and positive.

We do our best to use every situation to help others succeed. We do our best to use every situation to help others become a better leader. And we ask only that those people in turn, follow these same principles. Help others to succeed. Help others to become a better leader. There is no magic to building great teams and organizations. It’s hard work and it takes the efforts of everyone.

The above principles apply to every person in an organization because true leaders are not necessarily CEOs – they can be anyone and everyone. And I firmly agree with the authors of Tribal Leadership that the ultimate goal is to build a tribe of tribal leaders. Companies like Apple and Google show how powerful such tribes can be. One day, we want to be such a tribe (not necessarily in size or revenue – solely in attitude) – and this is a goal that should be shared by all start-ups.

Note: We’re honored that Dave Logan, one of the authors of Tribal Leadership, will visit crowdSPRING on September 2.

The Benefits of Working at a Start Up #2

Wednesday, August 27th, 2008

Mike Samson + Ross Kimbarovsky
“Does this adapter make me look fat?”

Boy, do I like to create series in the Blog…but more than that, I am just really excited to post this lovely picture of our fearless leaders, crowdSPRING co-Founders Mike Samson and Ross Kimbarovsky.

Earlier this month, Chicagoans were oh-so-lucky enough to experience a tornado rolling through our fair city. I had the fortune of a tree landing on my car (the Prius is a-okay though!), and our beautiful cement bunker in the West Loop was flooded to the point where Chris’ (one of our developers) flip flop floated to the other side of the office. The Great crowdSPRING Flood of ’08 also led to all of our power supplies being rendered useless. Instead of crying about it, we went out to lunch at Fiesta Mexicana for some burritos and took it upon ourselves to pretend Mike and Ross were Christmas trees with an affinity for Apple products and power strips. The image above is the outcome.

NOTE FROM ROSS: Angeline forgets that while having lunch at Fiesta Mexicana, we asked her to teach us how to use chopsticks. There is a good guide at wikiHow, and we all suspected that she wasn’t showing us the correct way, but…

Just another glimpse in the crazy yet fun world of internet start ups!

Start-up Tip: Surround Yourself With Smart People

Monday, August 25th, 2008

Mike and I stated working on crowdSPRING in the summer of 2006. We incorporated the company in May 2007 and launched the crowdSPRING marketplace in May 2008. We’ve learned many important lessons along the way. In some ways, our experience is typical of other start-ups. In other ways, it is not. I want to share some of our adventures (and mis-adventures) in the hope that it’ll help others looking to start a company or those who’ve already launched a start-up. So, once or twice every week for the next few months, I’ll post a new tip, based on our experience with crowdSPRING  over the past two years (and my experience advising technology start-ups over my 13 year career as an attorney).

Start-up Tip 1: Surround Yourself With Smart People

Very shortly before Mike and I started working on crowdSPRING in the summer of 2006, I read an article in BusinessWeek about Alex Zoghlin. Alex and I were classmates (and at one time, debate partners) at New Trier High School. In the interview, Alex said something that’s stuck with me. When asked what his primary role was at the various successful businesses he started, Alex said that his job “is, and always has been, to hire people who are significantly smarter than I am.”

The last 13 years (since the early days of commercial activity on the Internet) have shown that most technology start-ups fail. In fact, having smart people doesn’t guarantee success. But – a start-up cannot succeed without smart people. I believe this today more than ever. And I believe that this is the most important lesson anyone who wants to start a company (or who has already started a company) can learn.

Notice that I wrote surround yourself with smart people – not just hire smart people. What do I mean?

After we completed our initial market research in the Fall of 2006, we had sketched out a very rough idea of what we wanted to do with crowdSPRING. We found three people in our network and approached them with our very early plans. When we thought about the types of people with whom we could share our plans – we wanted people who’d question our every decision. We looked for the smartest people we knew because we needed a reality check. We needed to find skeptics – people who would not be afraid to tell us we would fail, and who would patiently explain HOW we would fail.

One of the three had founded and ran a very successful software company that was responsible for a substantial amount of innovation in games development for consoles and PCs. Another taught at a Top 2 MBA program in the United States and also had 17+ years of successful operating experience with a Fortune 500 company. The third owned and operated a very successful business.

I still remember the day we met with the MBA professor – we walked out of that meeting (this was early Fall 2006) feeling like we just went 10 rounds with Muhammad Ali. We could easily have folded then – in fact, that’s precisely what he suggested we do! But that meeting re-energized us. We spent the next 2 weeks researching, revising, re-revising, re-analyzing, and re-thinking. After 2 weeks, our ideas were crisper, stronger, more relevant, more refined, and smarter. We could not have done that without the pounding we took two weeks earlier.

We had the same experience with the other two people. After each meeting, we had to go back and deconstruct our thinking, review and rethink our plans, refocus our efforts, and improve what we were planning to do. And with each meeting, rather than become discouraged, we became crisper in our thinking, sharper in anticipating problems, and smarter about the future. All three people (and there were others too) pushed us hard to refine, rethink, re-research, and revise our plans.

We applied the same principles when building our team. We wanted to hire people who were significantly smarter than we were – people who would push us to be better and people from whom we could learn. We looked for people who were motivated to build something out of nothing, who were not afraid to fail, who were challenged by the fast-pace of a start-up, who were comfortable challenging our own thinking and assumptions, and who were comfortable challenging the status quo. We didn’t want people with a lot of attitude or those with unbearable personalities, and we’ve been very fortunate in that regard.

We weren’t looking for people with a strictly fixed skill set. In a start-up, there are few specialists – everyone is asked at one time or another to wear multiple hats (Mike and I take turns doing the dishes). We wanted people who had great skills in their core area, but who could also contribute on many other levels.

How do you know if someone who works for you is smarter than you? And even more importantly, how do you know if someone you are considering hiring is smarter than you?

There are a few telltale signs. During the interviews, focus on that person’s experience in prior jobs. For example: are they most proud that they recommended new ideas and solutions at those jobs, or most proud that they executed ideas and solutions recommended by others?

If you’ve already hired the person, ask yourself how often that person recommends great ideas that you didn’t think about first. Do they do this every day? Multiple times per day? Every week? Every month? You want to hire people that’ll bring great ideas to the table many times per day. Those are the types of people who will make your company better.

Now – there is an important distinction between smart people and intelligence. When I talk about smart people, I certainly include people who are intelligent. But mere intelligence – the ability to solve logic puzzles, for example – doesn’t mean that person is the right person for your team.

So what’s the difference? We looked for people with drive – those self-motivated to succeed. People who will not take failure as a defeat. People who will work hard to make sure that they succeed. People who will want to make everyone else better and smarter. These are rare traits – and not every highly intelligent person has them. Some people have them, while others don’t.

We’ve been very lucky to have built a great team in such a short amount of time. We’ve made several hiring mistakes along the way (which we’ve corrected by being disciplined and prompt – more on that later). By focusing on hiring smart people and creating an atmosphere that gives them every opportunity to contribute new ideas and solutions – we’ve given crowdSPRING a better chance to succeed and us a greater opportunity to learn. And that’s one of the reasons I love coming to work on Mondays.

Weekly Glance of Awesomeness #4

Friday, August 22nd, 2008

Hello my little crowdSPRINGers,
Here is this week’s Glance of Awesomeness. This week, we reached an all-time high in projects posted in a day. It was a very proud moment for us, so if you haven’t recently, Browse our current projects and contribute your ideas to one project or twenty! Here are some projects worth looking at:

Glance #1: Beautywebs.net Gallery Design
The Award: $400
End Date: August 26th
The Breakdown: Beauty is now in the eye of you, the creative! Beautywebs.net is looking to launch a new gallery site that features the creme de la creme of web sites on the internet, and they need you to help make their site equally beautiful. We’re a huge fan of inspiration sites, and crowdSPRING has actually been featured on several of them. Now it’s time for one of our creatives to design one!

Glance #2: FLIPPEX Newspaper Ad to Help Artists
The Award: $225
End Date: August 26th
The Breakdown: FIPPEX is an online capital exchange that needs a print ad for its site that will run in newspapers. They want to target artists, writers, actors, filmmakers, bands, bloggers, theatre troops, comedians, and entrepreneurs. The premise? Helping creatives get paid for the art they create. The crowdSPRING crew is always a huge fan of that concept, so help your fellow artists out.

Glance #3: Design an iPhone Application Logo
The Award: $325
End Date: August 27th
The Breakdown: Graffitio is an iPhone application that finds “Walls” near your location where other people have written about a place – whether a park, restaurant, shop, venue, etc., connecting you to people who have been there before and those who will follow. They need a grungier logo design to make them stand out from the web 2.0 crowd, and they are looking to crowdSPRING’s creatives to make that happen.

Glance #4: Name and Design Packaging for Wine Company
The Award: $500
End Date: September 2nd
The Breakdown: It’s interesting to see these projects pop up that really give you full creative reign. Last time, it was a crowdfunding web site, and now, this small winery would like our creatives to name and develop a visual identity for packaging their new bag in box wines. As points of reference, they mention Rothko, Mondrian, and other mid-20th century paintings. So get your modern on!

There you have it for this week, folks. Tune in next week for more Glances of Awesomeness, and feel free to send me any leads!

Inspiration and imitation

Wednesday, August 20th, 2008

In our continuing discussion of copyright, imitation and inspiration, I’ve decided to throw in my two cents. Hi, I’m Chris, one of the developers here at crowdSPRING. While I may spend most of my days making and breaking portions of our site, I did manage (and still try) to dedicate a small portion of my time to photography, among other things.

Back in my school days, the first images that really struck me were those of Ansel Adams. Perhaps because of my time spent camping and wandering the wilderness, his ability to capture the shear splendor of nature is, well… impressive. And to think he did it with early 1900′s view cameras and photographic plates, not to mention hiking through the wilderness, lugging that equipment. It’s simply inspiring. I know his work had an influence on me. While I never deliberately tried to imitate it, I definitely kept it in mind.

Earlier this week, Angeline and I were discussing our appreciation for photo artists who do their work in the lens – the ability to get the framing, exposure, composition, and expression of their scene or subject without any further tweaking or treatment in the darkroom or editing software. In his early work, Adams had no choice in this matter. It was all or nothing.

Wired recently ran a bit about another photographer, Mike Stimpson, who recreates famous photographs with Legos. Much of these prints had little or no post-exposure treatment. What’s really fascinating is how his use of everyday materials, when photographed in close proximity, loose their everyday appearance and become part of the scene. Also, the ability to work in small scale and get realistic, large scale results is no small feat.

The question here is, of course, is he creating original works of art, or is he just imitating? There’s no question he is drawing inspiration for his subjects from other artists’ work. It’s the execution that’s the difference. By virtue of the materials, size, equipment and budget, he cannot copy these famous works exactly. But that may well be part of the motivation. The lego figures add a sense of humor and, more importantly, artistic distance from their inspiration.

So where is the line? I’m not sure anyone can really say. Take Andy Warhol‘s Campbell Soup Cans (1962).

Andy Warhol, \

There is no doubt he intended to imitate the popular culinary icon, but that was part of his motivation. He repurposed everyday, cultural iconography and presented it as art and as a commentary on life, which, as some would argue, is the real function of art.

A similar and more recent example is the blog Garfield Minus Garfield in which blogger slash artist Dan Walsh scans single strips of Garfield comics and painstakingly removes the title character. What’s left is a rather depressing picture of a man, Jon Arbuckle, in somewhat darkly humorous and unsettling conversations with himself. At first reading you would assume that Jim Davis would be up in arms about this, but he and his publisher have actually approved and are planning on printing a book of the altered strips. Davis is even a fan of the blog.

Personally, I think the line can be drawn when art is imitated for commercial profit. Take Nike‘s campaign for the 2005 Major Threat skateboarding tour. Whether or not any licensing or money has changed hands, they explicitly copied the cover of Minor Threat‘s first EP, changing very little, to promote what is essentially a product marketing tour.

This particular album cover is fairly well known and has been imitated before (see Rancid’s 1995 release, …And Out Come the Wolves), but primarily out of tribute or respect. The error on Nike’s part was not obtaining permission to copy the artwork beforehand. Minor Threat frontman Ian MacKaye was admittedly perturbed and Nike issued a formal apology after the fact and promised to dispose of any version of the piece. Does this make it right?

Photographers definitely straddle this line. They take photos of real life. Whether staged or spontaneous, their subjects exist before and after the shutter falls. I like to think a photograph becomes art in how it’s viewed. The framing, perspective, exposure and composition come together at that moment, through the photographer’s eye, to create something unique. So does the line get crossed when the motivation behind art changes? Do those who imitate out of respect and adoration, or out of a need to express something about society break the rules? Or is it those who copy to help market their new product or campaign?

Tell A Lie

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008


(Tell A Lie Series by Hadlow + Cornish)

This Summer, graphic designer Henry Hadlow created a series of images with friend Ed Cornish called “Tell A Lie.” The designers came up with the concept as a response to the doctoring and misrepresentation of images in photojournalism as a result of Photoshop.

Hadlow + Cornish’s project makes a very creative statement about ethics and integrity when portraying news in the digital media age. As a photojournalist, it’s morally wrong to impose two images together and call it news.

However, as a digital photographer, this series raises an interesting topic: How far do you take digital editing in photography? Is Photoshop the digital darkroom, or is it an easy fix with all of its filters and color adjustment options? Technology gives us so many tools to perfect our work and create the output we ultimately wish to produce.

This weekend, I went to the Art Institute of Chicago to view their photography collection, which includes images from 1839 to present. It was inspiring to see so many incredible photographs at one time, and it served as a huge reminder for me that the foundation of a good picture is composition and the intent of the photographer. The photographers whose art hangs on the museum walls did not have Photoshop to help enhance their images. They had to rely solely on perfect settings, proper lighting, and a stellar creative approach to portray their subjects.

The trip to the museum definitely inspired me to get a little more ‘old school’ with my work. I put down the digital SLR for the day and picked my 35mm camera back up to remove myself from the idea of instant gratification in photography. Even with all of these great gadgets and high tech fixes, images (and all art, really) should be powerful on their own.

laFraise vs. crowdSPRING

Monday, August 18th, 2008

Calling all crowdSPRING creatives: We’ve teamed up with laFraise to host a t-shirt design project on their site for our community. The theme? “Creativity is….” (Would you expect anything less from a creative marketplace?) There’s quite the hefty reward involved for the top 3 entries, so keep reading for all the details…

Who is LaFraise?
laFraise is a European t-shirt website where designers submit their creative ideas, the crowd votes on its favorite, and ta-da! An excellent, exclusive t-shirt is born, and someone gets €1,000 richer. Obviously, it was love at first sight for us.

What is the project?
Give us the best design around the them of: “Creativity is _______”.

So what does creativity mean to you?

You can show us with typography, illustration, design – just show us (and show us real good)! Your design can be abstract or you can choose something concrete that represents creativity for you. We just want to see what creativity means to you, so have at it. Does creativity mean color and complexity or does creativity mean taming the chaos? Does creativity mean extravagant and ornate or does creativity mean simple and classic. Show us your answer and you’ll be rewarded handsomely!

What’s in it for me?
Not only will the top 3 entries receive an award of 1500 Euros each, but we’re also putting up 3 iPod Nanos that will be awarded to the top 3 entries. Keep in mind though that the project is only going to run from August 18th to September 1st, so quit reading and get going!!!

Enter the laFraise/crowdSPRING project here!