Archive for May, 2008

Chumby nation

Friday, May 30th, 2008

I got a Chumby, I got a Chumby (said in best schoolyard sing-song, please). Just off my right elbow is a 6″ wide bean bag with a touch screen. The device is hooked up to our wireless network in the office and the screen cycles through the half-dozen or so widgets I have loaded onto it. There is a weather widget which displays the next 5 day forecast, then comes my Pop email account displaying my inbox, after that it cycles to today’s NY Times headlines. I have it hooked up to a Photobucket album and it cycles through my pictures – a nice little digital picture frame. The Food Network gives me a recipe-of-the-day. The Onion delivers up funny stuff. After that, Google calendar pops up showing me the day’s events. A cute little puppy dog licks the screen clean from inside the Chumby. Huh? Not to mention the fact that it is a really cool alarm clock which can wake me up to internet radio or my own mp3′s.

I have only ever met three devices which changed the game for me: the TiVo I got in the Spring of 1999 keeps on humming and the Roomba robot vacuum I got three years ago keeps on sucking up the dog hair. Chumby is my new friend, and (I hope) will soon enter the pantheon of devices that make me approach my world in a different way.

Click the video to see what David Pogue had to say about my new…umm…thing.

Innovative Design – British Currency

Friday, May 30th, 2008

In March 2008, the United States Department of the Treasury unveiled the new five dollar bill. Featuring a purple Helvetica five, the new $5 USD bill was designed by a 147 year old government agency (U.S. Bureau of Engraving and Printing) which employes 2,500 people and has an annual budget of $525 million USD.

The British Royal Mint took a much different approach – and one we applaud. The Royal Mint held an open design contest in August 2005, which attracted 4,000 entries from 500 people. Anyone was eligible to compete. Specially invited artists, Royal Mint engravers and artists from other countries competed with people of all ages, from everywhere.

The winning designer was Matthew Dent, a 26 year old graphic designer from London. He had never before designed currency. The submitted designs were inspected by the Royal Mint Advisory Committee before their preferred design was recommended to the Chancellor of the Exchequer and finally approved by the Queen.

The new design is very clever – it splits the Shield of the Royal Army among all six coin denomination. The photo below illustrates this well.

Congratulations to Matthew Dent for a great design, and congratulations to the Royal Mint for its innovative competition.

Concept Copying – A Primer (Part 1 of 3)

Thursday, May 29th, 2008

It is easy to tell when something is the exact copy of something else -the two look alike, after all. Even small kids can compare two identical or virtually identical drawings and usually correctly determine whether the drawings are alike or different. It is far more difficult when the copy is not an exact or nearly exact duplicate, but simply another way to express an identical or similar concept.

This is the first in a multi-part series, where we’ll spend some time talking about a very important subject to the creative community – concept copying. In the creative field, a “concept” is an abstract idea that is typically described in words or represented visually. According to AIGA (the professional association for graphic design), “Graphic design is a creative process that combines art and technology to communicate ideas” If you read our earlier post about the Nike logo, you’ll recall the concept for the Nike logo design, reproduced below.

That concept was reduced to a visual form. Could another designer take this concept, change a few things (make it red, for example), and use it as their own work? If not, how does one draw the line – what is concept-copying and what is not? What is appropriate and what is not? That’s what we hope to discuss during this multi-part series.

One recent example that illustrates both the importance of this topic and the complexity of the discussion is a patent application filed by Apple in 2006 for a remote control-like controller that allows for full movement ( Apple’s patent application was published by the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the first time in May 2008). The Apple patent application describes a controller that works with a sensor, placed near the display. The sensor uses infrared technology to translate the movement of the controller in three dimensions. Apple no doubt intends to use such a device to support more interactive and gaming features on its Apple TV device (or successor product).

Sound familiar? Remind anyone of Nintendo’s Wii and its innovative controller which works with a sensor, using infrared technology to translate movement of the controller in three dimensions? Did Apple copy the concept for the Wii controller? After all, the Wii was released very shortly prior to the time Apple filed its patent application in November 2006.

More about this subject, and our continued discussion about the Apple patent, in a few days.

Building a Community – The AV123 Way

Wednesday, May 28th, 2008

Web 2.0 represents a cultural shift towards communities and transparency, towards openness and collaboration. Our own business opened its doors only earlier this month, and while we’ve been working hard to build a great community, we have very little to say (yet) about how to best build one. So, rather than give you a lot of theoretical BS – I thought I’d talk instead about another company I’ve long admired that has build a truly outstanding community over the past five years. They started building a community long before Web 2.0 was a phrase, and long before the word “community” became a buzzword.

AV123 (www.av123.com) is an internet company that produces and sells unique products that help redefine how much one needs to spend in order to own great performing audio equipment (audio speakers, subwoofers, electronics, cables, furniture and accessories). AV123 was founded by Mark L. Schifter, a veteran of the consumer electronics industry, (he was one of the principals at Genesis and an important contributor to the legendary APM-1 speaker). Mark also founded Audio Alchemy and Perpetual Technologies, two very successful companies. I am a very happy owner of multiple products made and sold by AV123. They are outstanding, affordable products.

When Mark formed AV123, he was entering a market where the direct-to-consumer sales model was heavily criticized by the bigger audio companies. In breaking through all of the noise (including huge dollars spent on advertising by the market leaders), Mark established a forum for his customers – and for anyone else who wanted to participate in the discussions, to learn, and to meet people. I’ve been a member of that forum (and community) since 2002, and I’ve personally seen it grow into an outstanding community of people who share a common love for audio.

It’s not the largest forum in the world for audio – that title is left to others (such as avsforum, for example). However, the AV123 forum has 7,500 loyal members, half a million posts, and a very active user base. More importantly, because Mark was firmly committed to transparency, openness and collaboration, it has something very few forums on the internet have – a REAL community. Real people, real voices, real collaboration. Because Mark has been transparent with how he runs his company (example: he regularly posts product sketches for products that are being designed), the community has been very transparent in interactions among users. Members of the community have become friends. And from time to time, in a way that defies the faceless Internet culture – that community even comes together to meet (I’ve hosted a few such meets – a nice challenge when 100+ friends visit your house).

So why has AV123 succeeded in building an outstanding community while many others have failed? It started with Mark and his vision for openness and transparency. He not only talked about this privately, he posted about this publicly and made sure that every employee he hired shared that vision. Users quickly learned that they were part of something special, and a common bond around music quickly grew into common interests in other areas. It was fueled by the common respect users had for one another. I’ve always found it remarkable that a user could post a thread on the av123 forum asking for a fair comparison between an av123 product and a product made by a competitor, and receive an honest, thorough response. I’ve been a member on many forums, and can tell you that this is rare. Very rare.

The av123 forum is a very special place. It’s a great example for anyone is looking to build an online community, and I encourage you to take a look.

Paying Your Employees To Quit

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

Zappos, the online shoe store, has a very unusual approach to weeding out customer service employees that Zappos does not believe will ultimately make the grade. One week into the training program for new customer service employees, Zappos offers new employees $1,000 to resign on the spot (about 10 percent accept). This is a very innovative and unusual practice.

Zappos believes that a new customer service employee willing to take the $1,000 and resign is not fully committed to the job and isn’t fully in touch with the Zappos culture. Zappos has concluded that the $1,000 payout is less then the cost of continuing to pay an unproductive/uninspired call center employee.

More details from Bill Taylor here.

Creative Living

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

If you were asked to design a house but had to make it no more than 94.5 inches (240 centimeters) wide, what would you do? Yes, that’s right – 94.5 inches WIDE.

Belgian architect-designers Pieter Peerlings and Silvia Mernets from sculp(it) were faced with just a dilemma for one of their projects located in Antwerp, Belgium.

The wall facing the outside is made entirely of glass. There are no shades. For more details and great photographs, click here.

Most Valuable Brand In The World: Google

Tuesday, May 27th, 2008

Market research firm Milward Brown concluded in its 2008 BrandZ rankings that Google, for the second year in a row, is the most valuable brand in the world — with an incredible $86 billion in brand value. Milward Brown combines balance sheet data with other factors, such as consumer sentiments, to come up with its rankings.

Google beat out Apple, General Electric, Microsoft, Coca-Cola, and China Mobile. Six of the top 10 spots and 28 of the top 100 spots in the rankings were occupied by technology companies.

Interestingly, Apple was the biggest riser, gaining $30 billion in brand value over the last year.

Ask crowdSPRING: How many countries does cS reach?

Monday, May 26th, 2008

We’ve long admired 37signals, a great Chicago company located only a few blocks from us. We love their products (Mike and I have used Backpack since 2006, when we first came up with the idea for crowdSPRING, and our development team uses Basecamp to manage multiple projects and for collaboration). We also love their Signal vs. Noise blog. Among our favorite subjects – Ask 37signals -where the 37signals team answers questions from users. We hope 37signals won’t mind…

Some of you have asked whether the United States accounts from most of the users on crowdSPRING. Users from the United States do account for a large amount of traffic to crowdSPRING. However, we’ve been amazed at our reach only two weeks following our public launch (May 6). The graphic below (from Google Analytics) shows access to crowdSPRING for the period May 19 to May 25, 2008. I’ll save you the counting — visitors last week came from 122 different countries/territories. Most interesting – a good number of logo design and other graphic and web design projects on crowdSPRING are being posted by buyers from outside the United States. We look forward to welcoming more friends from all over the world.

Xie Xie!

Submarine warfare

Friday, May 23rd, 2008

Every day we sit together over lunch. We have a big table and we either bring leftovers from home or go out to grab something in the neighborhood. It’s a really nice 30 or 40 minute break – the conversation usually is about movies or TV or politics. It serves to recharge us and has really helped us develop our nice little community.

We are fortunate because the West Loop neighborhood where we are located in Chicago has some great places for us to get food. We have excellent Chinese, burritos, Thai, and we have great sandwiches. Jerry’s is a gourmet deli with a menu that includes ~100 amazing combinations of really nice fresh gourmet ingredients.

We have a debate going between two places in the neighborhood, each of which makes fantastic Italian sub sandwiches. Vinnie’s is a classic Italian sub shop located on West Grand Avenue in Chicago. A simple counter with a couple little tables. They are all subs all the time. Simple, fresh ingredients, crafted by hand. Yum. A block or two east is Bari. Bari is an old-style Italian grocery with a deli counter at the rear of the store. They also serve up delicious subs, made to order.

Sean likes Bari. Chris likes Vinnie’s. Time for a side-by-side taste test. We finished lunch about an hour ago. Here are the sandwiches:

Bari Italian sub: 9″, on a crusty italian roll, Copicollo, Genoa salami, Mortadella and Provolone cheeses. Topped off with shredded lettuce, sliced tomato, and some home made giardiniera. Cost $4.75:

Vinnie’s Italian sub: 9″, on a french bread, Copicollo, Genoa salami, Mortadella and Provolone cheeses. Topped off with shredded lettuce, sliced tomato, and a home made balsamic vinaigrette. Cost $5.25:

Here’s our assessment. Bari’s bread was superior – soft and crusty. The vinaigrette from Vinnie’s was a really nice touch, with the balsamic adding nice flavor and aroma. The giardiniera from Bari’s was nice, but a little too spicy/overwhelming. Turns out that Sean got the “hot” variety, it might have been less overwhelming with the mild.

Overall winner: Sean and I agree that Bari was superior, primarily because of the bread. Not to mention 75¢ cheaper.

Buono appetito!

6th Grader Wins Doodle 4 Google Competition!

Thursday, May 22nd, 2008

Doodle 4 Google is a Google competition where United States students from kindergarten through twelfth grade are invited to submit a new logo design for Google’s homepage. This year, 16,000 entries were submitted. The winning entry was designed by Grace Moon, a 6th grader from California. The name of Grace’s entry is “Up in the Clouds” and is on Google’s homepage today for the world to see. Very cool – and a great job, Grace!

You can see the regional winners for 2008 by visiting this link.